14:01:18 #startmeeting oVirt Node Weekly Meeting 14:01:18 Meeting started Tue Dec 10 14:01:18 2013 UTC. The chair is fabiand. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:01:25 #chair jboggs mburns rbarry 14:01:25 Current chairs: fabiand jboggs mburns rbarry 14:01:30 #topic Agenda 14:01:30 * rbarry_ here 14:01:40 #info el6 ISO 14:01:46 #info Fedora 20 port 14:01:47 * jboggs here 14:01:57 #info Other items 14:02:04 #undo 14:02:04 Removing item from minutes: 14:02:04 yo, me is here! 14:02:15 #info Image wrapper rpm 14:02:19 #info Other 14:02:23 #topic el6 ISO 14:02:34 Hey, rbarry, jboggs , YamakasY 14:02:44 I have seen that my 3.3.1 install sometimes stops or suspends VM's... ade also told me that he had it on 3.3.0 14:02:48 * alitke is here 14:03:08 I planned to do the el6 respin over the last week - but I didn't find time to do it. 14:03:08 fabiand: hellow 14:03:11 alitke, hey! 14:03:21 #info fabiand did not build el6 ISO 14:03:36 fabiand, there is an el6 bug I fiuxed yesterday 14:03:40 er fixed 14:03:50 There is also a thread on the users-ml discussing Node 14:04:00 jboggs, nice to know - in gerrit? 14:04:22 yep, its a bootloader issue so el6 installs would fail anyway 14:04:49 okay 14:05:04 I also did a fix to fix the el6 auto-builds 14:05:12 this brings us closer to a el6 build 14:05:21 #info jboggs fixed an el6 bootloader issues 14:05:32 #info fabiand fixed el6 auto-builds 14:05:51 I'd target a respin for the coming week again 14:06:00 is btw the glusterfs issue resolved by the ovirt repo itself ? 14:06:07 I was on that this week also 14:06:10 YamakasY, have you got a bugzilla link 14:06:12 ? 14:06:39 fabiand: yap 14:06:43 just a sec 14:06:46 So, basically we can be in a good shape, just needs a build and testing 14:06:57 fabiand: yes we are 14:07:07 #info el6 ISO needs build and testing 14:07:11 some hangs with VM's only on starting and running 14:07:24 okay 14:07:37 #action fabiand to do respin until Dec 17 14:07:49 #topic Fedora 20 port 14:07:57 rbarry, any update here? 14:08:12 fabiand: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033587 14:08:25 I got an image built, which is basically sane, but needs more testing and trimming 14:08:34 Something in the F20 build process is pulling in a lot of extraneous packages 14:08:55 And our specfile is going to get messier, but the amount o fchanges seems relatively low 14:09:05 YamakasY, seems as if that bugs is VERIFIED 14:09:11 fabiand: yes but not fixed 14:09:17 Unversioned docs, requiring /usr/bin/hostname instead of /bin/hostname, and we get a 220MB image 14:09:22 YamakasY, just a matter of time 14:09:28 rbarry, okay .. 14:09:30 fabiand: hurry hurry! 14:09:31 :P 14:09:31 Still testing and tweaking, but it should easily be done by next week 14:09:37 fabiand: it's confusing 14:09:42 and very simple to solve 14:09:50 rbarry, okay - did you need any f20 related packages? 14:10:06 s/packages/patches/ 14:10:38 We *might* need selinux-policy-doc, but that's not F20 specific. The only patch we need is related to BZ 999584, as far as I've discovered 14:11:33 But it's a pretty straightforward port 14:11:39 rbarry, okay - that doesn't sound to bad :) 14:12:48 #info Fedora 20 port seems to be straight forward, some adjustments and exlusions 14:13:10 rbarry, could you also drive the effort to setup a jenkins job for the fedora 20 builds? 14:13:31 Which might not be time critical .. 14:13:32 fabiand: That's the plan ;) 14:13:40 yey 14:13:42 :) 14:13:56 #action rbarry to drive Fedora 20 jenkins job for Node 14:14:16 okay 14:14:34 #topic Image wrapper rpm 14:15:04 #info fabiand got hands on creating wrapper rpm 14:15:29 I was about to build the wrapper rpms when I noted that the ISO name of the vdsm is different then previously 14:15:38 This could be a problem for oVirt Engine. 14:15:52 Especially beccause the RPM name differs from what is written in /etc/system-release 14:16:30 A solution is to rename the vdsm iso to the name of the base image iso, but I didn't want to follow that path to quick . 14:16:39 But we might not get around this. 14:16:51 jboggs, do you know if the /etc/system-release file in an edited iso is modified? 14:17:20 it adds an indicator if it was edited and or signed packages were used 14:17:28 okay .. 14:17:33 I think that is fine 14:17:47 There is still the problem that we will have to iso images having the same name 14:17:51 (vdsm iso and base image iso) 14:18:23 There is still a positive side: The vdsm iso will only be named like this within the wrapper rpm. 14:18:26 Still - this is not nice. 14:19:22 The idea: Rename ISO to match Engines naming expectations and add a README to wrapper rpm 14:19:30 Long term: Work with Engine to also accept other ISO names 14:20:26 Also: Add a hint to the filename of a base image iso, to indicate that it's a base image 14:20:46 basically nvr-.iso 14:20:52 nvr-bi.iso 14:20:54 nvr-vdsm.iso 14:20:57 something like this 14:21:25 #action fabiand to open bug to discuss with Engine people about the naming of isos and related constraints 14:21:44 #action fabiand to create wrapper rpm with renamed VDSM iso and README 14:21:50 #topic Other 14:21:59 anything else someone wants to bring up? :) 14:22:06 rbarry, jboggs, alitke, YamakasY ? 14:22:21 nothing for me... Just lurking today. 14:22:33 nothing here 14:22:35 alitke, sounds good - keep lurking :) 14:22:35 uhm, not yet, yes some good docs for spice setup would be good 14:22:39 Nothing here 14:22:48 right 14:22:59 # action YamaskY to write good docs for spice setup ;) 14:23:09 YamakasY, ^^ 14:23:11 thanks 14:23:16 #endmeeting