15:13:29 #startmeeting oVirt Node Weekly Meeting 15:13:29 Meeting started Tue Mar 18 15:13:29 2014 UTC. The chair is fabiand. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:13:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:13:36 #chair jboggs rbarry 15:13:36 Current chairs: fabiand jboggs rbarry 15:13:40 #topic Agenda 15:13:41 * rbarry here 15:13:42 * jboggs here 15:13:47 Let's make it short today 15:13:55 #info Release planning 15:14:05 #info Fedora 20 status 15:14:07 #info Jenkins 15:14:12 #info Other items 15:14:28 #topic Release planning 15:14:39 here are a couple of changes we could use for 3.0.5 .. 15:14:46 and 3.0.4 seems to be quite stable .. 15:14:58 So I'd like to slowly start to prepare for 3.0.5 15:15:18 #info Slowly prepare 2.0.5 with stabilizing patches 15:15:30 One thing I'd like to address ith 3.0.5 is to bring our Fedora based builds back .. 15:15:34 People asked for them .. 15:15:52 #info Re-Add Fedora based Node's with 3.0.5 .. 15:16:14 I don't want to include any features into 3.0.5 .. 15:16:25 If that's fine, then I'd move on to the next item 15:17:11 It currently has SELinux problems 15:17:36 #topic Fedora 20 status 15:17:39 Rather, new fedora builds do. But that's an ongoing problem anyway, and I'll hopefully ahve a patch today 15:17:42 rbarry, you mean the f20 build? 15:18:02 See also, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068740 15:18:30 Fedora 19 also has SELinux problems on new builds at present. Something with localed or logind. I'm just about to test another image. 15:19:07 There's a fix for dracut in rawhide, but no new kernels (including new F19 builds) will be able to PXEboot newly built node ISOs 15:19:07 yeah 15:19:21 The selinux problems - and upgrades to the policy - prevented me from doing the F19 builds 15:19:32 rbarry, oh - so it really is a dracut problem? 15:19:46 Yeah. Well, it's a kernel problem that dracut has to work around. 15:19:54 oh okay 15:20:04 But dracut 036 is only in rawhide. We'll probably have to ask them to backport to at least F20 15:20:31 rbarry, can you say which patch needs to be backported? 15:21:06 * fabiand read the bug 15:21:26 Comment #2 from the bug, it looks like. http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/dracut/dracut.git/commit/?id=ba9368fa4fedda0f72d84f910d01d7da201405a3 15:22:25 Okay, 15:22:46 rbarry, does the F20 build boot at all when you use enforcing=0? 15:23:28 Both F20 and F19 boot with enforcing=0. But users can't log in, and the installer hangs as soon as you click the first button and start the locale service. 15:23:47 rbarry, they even can't login with enforcing=0? 15:23:55 Yes, they can with enforcing=0. 15:24:10 okay 15:24:12 that is good news 15:24:22 I could take a look at the selinux problems .. 15:24:33 Or do you want to tackle them :)? 15:25:07 I'm pretty confident that I can tackle them, but I'll ping you if I run into trouble 15:25:20 ack great! 15:25:32 rbarry, could you publish them in a f20 topic branch in gerrit 15:26:31 Sure. Though they're also applicable to f19, so I'm not sure if a f20 branch is appropriate, though it may make them easier to track 15:26:53 Yes, I agree that they might be relevant for F19 as well. 15:27:09 But do we agree that we only want to support one Fedora version? 15:27:27 I mean Fedora 20 has been out for a while now - and I know that it has issues with gfx, btu maybe it's stable enough for node? 15:28:00 I would like to avoid bringing Node into shape for F19 and directly jump to f20. . 15:28:00 may be best, getting other potential backports on 19 might be much harder 15:28:03 If there's a working vdsm version for Fedora 20, I'm happy to move to 20 15:28:10 Yep 15:28:42 looking here http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.4.0-rc2/rpm/Fedora/ 15:28:44 it seems as if there are 15:28:55 even more detailed: 15:28:56 http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.4.0-rc2/rpm/Fedora/20/x86_64/ 15:30:19 rbarry, I'd rather like us to start working on f21 support early .. 15:30:33 so basically: skip f19, have f20 support, and then maybe start on playing with rawhide .. 15:30:52 so basically not running behind, but keeping slightly the same schedule ... which won't be possibel. 15:31:24 but fedora 19 was released on July 2nd 2013 which is already quite old .. 15:36:19 No objections 15:36:26 * jboggs neither 15:36:53 okay 15:38:42 Let's see how it goes .. 15:39:01 #topic Jenkins 15:42:04 Jenkins is two fold 15:42:09 Our current jobs 15:42:14 and support for the Fedora builds we plan... 15:42:33 But I'd favor to push this out now a bit - to next week 15:43:30 It's not critical and let's see if we have a working F20 build available before we update jenkins .. 15:43:36 sounds if selinux prevents us a bit 15:43:53 otoh I'll once again ask infra to enable selinux in permissive mode on the builders 15:44:05 #action fabiand to ask infra to at least enable selinux in permissive mode .. 15:44:16 #topic Other items 15:44:23 anything else rbarry jboggs ? 15:44:28 * jboggs is taking a look at hosted engine support 15:44:28 Nothing here 15:44:38 Ah, yes. Gluster working 15:44:44 will likely be a plugin is fs size is an issue 15:44:56 rbarry, gluster is working!? 15:44:57 :) 15:44:58 I'll put together a quick plugin page, but all it took was a few iptables rules 15:45:09 rbarry, great news! 15:45:14 I know that people were looking for it! 15:45:27 jboggs, sorry could you elaborate 15:45:30 I don't have a gluster ovirt domain to test with, but I was able to mount the volume on another system and place files which were replicated 15:45:31 On /data 15:45:40 #info glsuerfs will work with some iptables updates and might get even a plugin 15:45:57 rbarry, okay - that's nice to have the basics! 15:46:09 #info glusterfs basics have been tested by rbarry 15:46:25 looks like it's pulling in some pulseaudio dependencies, just wouldnt want to have those in the the base image, possible blackisting, just now looking so there will likely be some optimizations 15:46:40 okay, jboggs what pulled in pulse audio? 15:46:48 ovirt-hosted-engine-setup 15:46:59 ugh ... the gain more and more features :) 15:47:38 jboggs, could you see if it was a direct dependency or did it happen indirect through some other pkg=? 15:47:41 its about 9MB in rpm format, hopefully it can remain compressed like that and no worries 15:47:56 yeah will look, working on POC for now :) 15:48:18 nce 15:48:28 #info jboggs started to work on hosted engine support 15:48:53 jboggs, I thought about whether we should you an installer page or setup page to setup the hosted engine stuff 15:49:08 My final thought was to use the setup - so adding a setup page 15:49:19 you would need networking support so yeah setup would be best 15:49:32 The reasoning behind it was - a setup page can be used to initiate the hosted engine and additionally it can provide stats about the VM carrying the engine 15:49:38 agreed! 15:50:53 So - interestng other items part today! 15:51:07 I fthere is nothing else ... 15:51:14 * jboggs is good 15:52:07 I hope rbarry is good too 15:52:11 Going once 15:52:11 Also good 15:52:13 twice 15:52:15 ah 15:52:20 and a third time 15:52:21 #endmeeting