14:01:00 #startmeeting infra weekly meeting 14:01:00 Meeting started Mon Apr 29 14:01:00 2013 UTC. The chair is ewoud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:01:02 ovirt doesn't 14:01:16 copy paste from http://www.ovirt.org/Infrastructure_team_meetings#2013-04-29 14:01:25 Introductions 14:01:25 Review of action items 14:01:25 ewoud restart the puppet ML thread 14:01:25 ewoud start a thread on monitoring/trending 14:01:25 Rydekull add the jenkins slaves on a list on the wiki 14:01:28 quaid work on a docs sprint 14:01:30 quaid to bring dcaro & eedri in to the ACLs for RackSpace so they can take it over 14:01:33 Hosting 14:01:36 rackspace01 installed? 14:01:38 obasan, here 14:01:38 Puppet 14:01:41 Jenkins 14:01:43 Other business? 14:01:46 Trac review 14:01:51 missing anything on the agenda? 14:02:36 #chair dcaro dneary 14:02:36 Current chairs: dcaro dneary ewoud 14:02:42 #topic introductions 14:03:00 any (potential) new infra members would like to introduce themselves? 14:03:37 #topic Review of action items 14:04:07 I have not started the puppet ML thread, nor the monitoring/trending, will do so 14:04:51 dcaro: did quaid give you and/or eedri access to the rackspace machines? 14:05:09 * quaid is here 14:05:21 #chair quaid 14:05:21 Current chairs: dcaro dneary ewoud quaid 14:05:25 ewoud: yes, we have access, this week we should start playing with it (last week there was a lot of work) 14:05:36 * knesenko here as well\ 14:05:45 * obasan here 14:06:10 #chair obasan knesenko 14:06:10 Current chairs: dcaro dneary ewoud knesenko obasan quaid 14:06:17 dcaro: that's good 14:06:28 quaid: any progress on the docs sprint? 14:07:04 none, although handing off the rackspace servers clears my way; I'll write up an email now to the list to find a few compatible times for folks 14:07:34 quaid: cool 14:09:07 #action quaid look for compatible times for a docs sprint 14:09:21 #action dcaro eedri install the rackspace servers 14:09:40 #action Rydekull Add the jenkins slaves on a list on the wiki 14:09:46 #action ewoud restart the puppet ML thread 14:09:53 #action ewoud start a thread on monitoring/trending 14:09:59 #topic Hosting 14:10:10 let's start with alterway 14:10:24 I haven't seen a reply on the IP space yet 14:11:02 is it time for a plan B with NAT or do we wait? 14:12:01 ewoud: do you think that it will be hard to migrate from NAT to ips if we finally get them? 14:13:05 dcaro: not sure 14:13:56 but with public facing services such as a webserver I don't like the idea of NAT 14:15:51 anyone else has an opinion here? 14:17:13 nope] 14:18:16 dneary: you've had some more contact with them, any insight? 14:22:02 another possibility is to not virtualize at all on alterway02, but it's not something I'd prefer either 14:24:05 while we let that sink in, let's speak about rackspace 14:24:38 I know dcaro said he had no time yet, but I'd like to avoid a similar situation where we install it but then run into the same problem 14:25:02 we plan to virtualize, but do we have some IP space? can jenkins slaves run without a public IP? 14:25:37 ewoud: yes they can, through the jnpl slave you can connect behind a NAT (I haven't tested it though) 14:28:03 dcaro: ok, is that something you could look into? 14:29:14 sorry - was afk for a second 14:29:16 ewoud: yes, I will 14:29:51 #action dcaro look into running jenkins slaves @ rackspace + IP space 14:29:59 ewoud, re AlterWay & IPs, I'm missing a little bit of background - is there a Trac ticket I can point them at? 14:30:21 dneary: no, just a ML discussion 14:30:58 http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/2013-April/002622.html 14:32:59 dneary: long story short: we need public IPs for our VMs on alterway02 14:35:13 I'll ping on the ML again, maybe my message wasn't clear to alterway 14:35:42 #action ewoud re-ignite the IP space discussion on the ML 14:36:03 anything else on hosting? 14:38:08 #topic Puppet 14:38:53 not sure what we can discuss about this till we can actually get this started with a puppet master and that depends on the alterway IPs 14:40:34 ewoud, What do you mean by "alterway IPs" exactly? 14:40:44 Excuse me for coming late to the story 14:41:15 dneary: we currently have 2 IPs there: one for each physical host, but if we want to run VMs, they need IPs 14:41:26 Right 14:41:40 They get them from ovirt-manager when they start up, correct? 14:41:41 the easiest solution is to get extra IPs from alterway 14:42:08 we have 2 dedicated servers, both with static IPs 14:42:16 Yes 14:42:39 Do the VMs get local dynamic IPs from dhcp when they start? 14:42:52 and I'm not sure how ovirt-manager could give the VMs IPs since we haven't been given an IP pool by alterway AFAIK 14:43:18 or if alterway actually has DHCP running 14:44:13 and if it's the case that we can use DHCP, how much guarantee do we have that they're persistent 14:45:46 dneary: does that make it clear? 14:46:00 OK 14:46:05 Yes, that clears it up 14:46:10 Let me open a trac to track 14:46:38 Incidentally, speaking of trac: https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/ticket/44 14:46:49 Anyone have any idea how to get piwik working on OpenShift? 14:47:47 no, but I could look into it 14:48:22 just found a link 14:49:25 https://github.com/openshift/piwik-openshift-quickstart looks easy enough 14:50:01 http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2013/03/21/how-to-deploy-piwik-web-analytics-on-openshift-online/ as well 14:50:27 https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/ticket/45 14:50:47 ewoud, Do you know how to deploy a quickstart on top of another one? 14:50:59 (I'm assuming piwik needs access to logs) 14:51:35 dneary: piwik doesn't need access to logs, you include a snippet of javascript and piwik works from there 14:51:40 so they can run on different servers 14:53:45 #action ewoud look into running piwik on openshift 14:54:00 #topic jenkins 14:54:11 anything new to mention about jenkins? 14:54:20 dcaro: eedri ? 14:55:06 ewoud: we had some problems with gerrit triggers not firing, just fyi, it was solver restarting the poller thread (under jenkins -> management -> gerrit trigger) 14:55:33 I saw no traces that whould be of help in the logs to autodetect that failure though :S 14:56:01 ok 14:56:26 we also discussed that the f17 slave is under a bit of load and it seems java jobs need a lot of memory 14:57:04 yep, I've changed the number of executors to 2, hopefully that will avoid too many jobs rinning at the same time 14:58:31 we should monitor that the amount of jobs doesn't queue up too much 14:58:38 #topic other business 14:59:06 I've noticed that sometihg I'm having a bit of a monologue during the meeting 14:59:34 does that mean the meeting time is bad for a lot of people with double agenda's or is there something else we can do to improve this? 15:02:57 ewoud: no its not 15:03:15 ewoud: I think that because of some people are not in the loop 15:03:27 like me or obasan 15:03:34 knesenko: I can see that, but how can we improve that? 15:04:06 ewoud: its not related to u ... we need talk here to eedri to improve it 15:04:10 I have no experience in working on a non-traditional team where you all work for the same company in the same office 15:05:05 ewoud: I"ll to eedri tomorrow ... 15:05:21 will need to see how can we improve our work in upstream ... 15:05:40 knesenko: keep me in the loop ;) 15:05:49 ewoud: I"ll update u 15:06:07 #action knesenko talk to eedri about making work more transparant 15:07:07 ok, closing then 15:07:08 * knesenko will do 15:07:12 going once 15:07:40 going twice 15:07:45 ok, thanks all 15:07:48 #endmeeting