15:00:43 #startmeeting oVirt weekly meeting 15:00:43 Meeting started Wed Jan 30 15:00:43 2013 UTC. The chair is mburns. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:43 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:50 Hi all 15:00:59 I will be AFK for a few minutes while I get to the office 15:00:59 #chair dneary oschreib 15:00:59 Current chairs: dneary mburns oschreib 15:01:00 * oschreib here at last 15:01:01 Hi dneary 15:01:08 But I'll be here for a few mins first 15:01:17 #topic agenda and roll call 15:01:21 * dustins here 15:01:22 * jb_netapp here 15:01:25 hi jb_netapp 15:01:25 * Release Status 15:01:35 * Workshop update 15:01:42 * Team reports 15:02:15 mburns, Mind if we invert the order of the first 2? The workshop update will be really quick 15:02:23 dneary: sure 15:02:29 Thanks 15:02:33 just give people another minute or so for roll call 15:03:28 #topic Workshop update 15:03:33 * mgoldboi here 15:04:25 dneary: all yours 15:04:31 #chair mgoldboi 15:04:31 Current chairs: dneary mburns mgoldboi oschreib 15:04:33 The Sunnyvale workshop went great! 15:04:58 we had almost 100 registered (about a 30% no-show rate for first two days) 15:05:33 #info Sunnyvale workshop went great 15:05:38 We got almost full attendance at the board meeting, and got support for our proposed marketing & product plans for the year - we now need to follow up with community 15:05:46 #info almost 100 registered (~30% no-show for first 2 days) 15:06:09 #info board meeting had almost full attendance 15:06:26 #info got support for proposed marketing, now need to follow up with the community 15:07:02 * Rydekull is here, listening 15:07:33 Next oVirt event of note: Puppet Camp where Oved Ourfali will present Deltacloud integration into oVirt via UI plug-ins, and the virtualisation DevRoom at FOSDEM, where we are out in force (co-organised with the Xen community and Renzo Davoli 15:08:03 dneary: FOSDEM and related presentations doesnt count as a "oVirt Event"? 15:08:16 (that PuppetCamp presentation is during the buily a cloud day, organised by CloudStack people) 15:08:16 oh 15:08:26 * Rydekull reread the sentence 15:08:28 :_D 15:08:31 Rydekull, Puppet Camp is in Ghent on Thursday and Friday 15:09:04 #info next event: Oved Ourfali presenting on deltacloud integration into oVirt at Puppet Camp 15:09:22 We finalised the dates for the Shanghai workshop at Intel also: it will be on 8-9 May (not sure if I had that for you all last week, I think so) 15:09:23 #info FOSDEM -- we are out in force with the virt devroom 15:09:45 #info finalized dates for Shanghai workshop at Intel -- May 8-9 15:10:00 And I'm done 15:10:01 Hi, I have installed ovirt and configed a bonding interface with eth0 and eth1 for de management lan. That ok but when I want to add a VM network to it with a vlan tag that's not possible. So then I wanted to remove the bonding and use eth0 for management and eth1 for the vm networks but how can you remove a bonding? 15:10:18 dneary: i think it was mentioned, but not a bad decision to mention it again 15:10:52 ok, any questions/comments/concerns on workshops? 15:11:51 ok, moving on 15:11:55 #topic release status 15:12:06 #info test day tomorrow (31-Jan) 15:12:21 #info beta announcement ready, to be sent later today 15:12:26 Hi Jur! I'm sure that there are people who can help you with your question (not me, though) - do you think you could ask again in ~45 mins? We're just starting a release management meeting (in which you're welcome to participate!) 15:12:50 #info ovirt-node packages and image in final testing, to be posted today 15:13:47 dougsland: ! 15:14:03 #info ovirt-node blocked by vdsm bug 905728 (patch: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/11527/ ) 15:14:03 mburns: superb :) 15:14:16 Ow sorry for interrupting dneary 15:14:19 #info but we can workaround this issue in ovirt-node for the beta 15:14:30 Jur: no worries... 15:14:31 Jur, Absolutely no problem! 15:14:50 I just didn't want you to be disappointed if you thought that all these people were ignoring you :-) 15:15:01 mgoldboi: anything to mention for the test day tomorrow? 15:15:07 Hehehe 15:15:19 well, yes... 15:15:50 all invited to participate, development teams will be available on this channel for questios 15:16:21 if you are planing to join please subscribe yourself at http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/OvirtTestDay 15:16:34 just a thought -> tracker bug to gather all testing day bugs? ( 15:16:42 #info Test Day: all are invited to participate 15:17:02 #info please sign up on http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/OvirtTestDay 15:17:32 oschreib: sure, probably worth it, though that can be done after the fact 15:18:12 indeed. 15:18:22 just might be a good idea to track them. 15:18:46 ack 15:20:06 mburns: will we have ovirt-node for tomorrow? 15:20:13 mgoldboi: yes 15:20:19 will be posted later today 15:20:23 mburns: wow - good news!! 15:20:31 just testing a workaround for a vdsm bug 15:20:42 and doing some final cleanup/testing 15:21:21 mburns: if you could go over the node section on testday wiki and update relevant items/links it could be great 15:21:29 mgoldboi: yes, i will do that today 15:21:39 #action mburns to review testday wiki node section 15:21:50 #action mburns to send out beta announcement 15:21:59 #action mburns to post ovirt-node for beta/test day 15:22:38 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=881006&hide_resolved=1 15:22:48 a list of the bugs being tracked for the release 15:23:05 #info ^^ a list of the bugs being tracked for the release 15:23:09 bye all, stepping away 15:23:25 thanks dneary 15:23:51 #info Bug 879180 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879180 15:24:01 #info New -- against NetworkManager 15:24:08 is this really a blocker for 3.2? 15:24:41 it seems to block 869963, but that is on_qa so i'm guessing we worked around it? 15:24:49 fsimonce: danken: ^^ 15:26:11 danken: also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884990 15:26:15 is that a blocker for 3.2? 15:26:33 because it appears to be targeted for rawhide and is in the biosdevname component 15:26:40 danken1: ^^ 15:27:17 #action ovirt-node bugs on the list are all targeted for the beta, mburns will update bugs later today 15:27:59 #info only bugs not at least on POST in the list (outside ovirt-node bugs) are 879180 and 884990 15:28:13 #info both of which are in core fedora components 15:28:19 not ovirt components 15:28:48 #info not ovirt components 15:29:00 * oschreib taking a look 15:29:12 so we should be in decent shape for GA as long as other blocker bugs don't surface from the Test Day 15:31:23 any other comments on the release status? 15:31:50 mburns: i think we would be smarter after testday 15:32:06 mgoldboi: yes, i agree 15:32:46 +` 15:32:47 +1 15:33:12 ok, then we'll move on and review this again after the test day 15:33:22 oschreib: mgoldboi: perhaps go over this again on Monday? 15:33:37 mburns: sounds good 15:33:41 go over what? blocker bugs? 15:33:45 oschreib: yes 15:33:51 sounds good 15:33:53 same time? 15:33:58 and potential blockers for the release 15:34:10 guys can I already update the centos packages from another repo ? 15:34:25 oschreib: no, let's do 1 hour earlier 15:34:34 infra has their meeting here at this time 15:34:49 ok 15:35:00 oschreib: assuming that works for you and mgoldboi 15:35:09 mburns: sure 15:35:14 ok 15:35:19 moving on then 15:35:27 #topic Infra report 15:35:43 ewoud: can you give an update for the infra team? 15:35:47 or is there someone else? 15:35:53 #chair ewoud 15:35:53 Current chairs: dneary ewoud mburns mgoldboi oschreib 15:35:56 * ewoud just arrived 15:36:28 short update is that we haven't had time to set up the new hardware we got from alterways 15:36:55 we should receive credentials, but we didn't pass that along very well with quaid on vacation 15:37:13 #info new hardware from AlterWay not set up yet, but in progress 15:37:45 at FOSDEM we'll at least have a short meeting with dneary, quaid, Rydekull and me to say hi and maybe discuss a bit 15:38:18 #info infra team meetup at FOSDEM ( ewoud quaid dneary Rydekull ) 15:38:29 ewoud: excellent 15:38:52 mburns: I think that's it 15:39:02 ok 15:39:05 thanks ewoud 15:39:06 I believe that BugĀ 884990 - non deterministic bios dev naming in KVM guests 15:39:06 is pretty bad 15:39:06 \o/ 15:39:15 #topic Other topics 15:39:30 anyone have other topics? 15:39:38 danken1: any idea if people are working on it? 15:39:41 mburns: and I think we should put some more pressure on biosdevname 15:40:05 mburns: not seriously, I am afraid 15:40:07 i'm not sure we should hold the release for that, but agree we should put pressure on them 15:40:22 I think it is important to flash the red lights about it 15:41:35 I have no idea why the heck they've debilitated sane naming once they notice it is a VM 15:42:57 danken1: does it block some feature we want for 3.2? 15:43:40 sounds like biosdevname isn't interested in doing anything here 15:44:06 the systemd/udev people are introducing another naming scheme for net devices fwiw 15:44:35 danken1: i'll read through the bug and see if i can push it along at all 15:44:46 and we can review again next week if we should block on this 15:45:03 ok, if no other topics, then we can close this meeting 15:45:07 going once... 15:46:24 twice.. 15:46:41 gone 15:46:44 thanks all 15:46:46 #endmeeting