14:00:19 <oschreib> #startmeeting oVirt Weekly Sync
14:00:19 <ovirtbot> Meeting started Wed Jun 27 14:00:19 2012 UTC.  The chair is oschreib. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:19 <ovirtbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
14:00:29 <oschreib> #topic agenda and roll call
14:00:51 <oschreib> 1. Status of next release and blocker overview
14:00:57 <oschreib> 2. Sub-project reports (engine, vdsm, node)
14:01:09 <oschreib> 3. Upcoming workshops
14:01:43 <oschreib> anyone here?
14:01:58 * dustins here
14:02:49 * fabiand is listening
14:03:04 <oschreib> let's wait two more minutes, I hope we will have more attendees.
14:03:21 * RobertM here
14:03:52 * Guest1297 is here, lurking
14:04:11 * ofrenkel here
14:04:31 <quaid> dneary & I are in a physical meeting right now, so not very attentive
14:05:34 <oschreib> amm, I wonder if there's a point to do this meeting.
14:06:11 <oschreib> the Red Hat summit probably takes some of the usual atendees
14:06:29 <oschreib> who's representing Node and VDSM?
14:07:20 <oschreib> thoughts?
14:07:45 <RobertM> Release day is less then 2 weeks away
14:07:53 <oschreib> tell me about it :)
14:08:39 <RobertM> That reminds me I forgot to bug that the fact that the iso list doesn't update unless you look at it.
14:08:58 <oschreib> RobertM: please do
14:09:21 <oschreib> I think there's no point to this meeting without developers attendance
14:09:51 <ofrenkel> im here
14:09:52 <fabiand> I could say something about node
14:09:57 <fabiand> but haven't got the whole overview
14:10:39 <oschreib> ofrenkel and fabiand: are you familiar with 3.1 blockers?
14:11:02 <fabiand> oschreib, no
14:11:44 <ofrenkel> oschreib, can you please post the tracker bug link?
14:12:19 <oschreib> ofrenkel:
14:12:20 <oschreib> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822145
14:12:28 <oschreib> lets try to do it, will see how it goes
14:12:41 <oschreib> #topic Status of next release
14:12:53 <oschreib> #info GA date is July 9th
14:13:12 <oschreib> #info 11 blocker currently in the 3.1 tracker
14:13:32 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822145
14:13:37 <sgordon> i discussed with itamar about release notes, sounds like i am not going to get anywhere with that till post-summit
14:14:05 <oschreib> sgordon: lets discuses it later on. but probably right.
14:14:08 <sgordon> as an aside working out what features are complete/included is basically impossible based on the wiki, and no feature bugs
14:14:34 <oschreib> I'll add an RN topic
14:14:55 <oschreib> ok, I'll go over the blocker bugs
14:15:05 <RobertM> Yes there doesn't seem to be a way based on the wiki to know if a feature is done or not.
14:15:23 <oschreib> please share with us their status, time estimation, and any relevant info
14:16:17 <oschreib> #info Sanlock locking failed for readonly devices  (component: libvirt, status: ASSIGNED)
14:16:17 <quaid> RobertM: the feature owner can put the wiki page in a different category
14:16:24 <quaid> e.g. [[Category:Feature complete]]
14:16:32 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828633
14:16:46 <READ10> oschreib: patch upstream; awaiting review
14:16:52 <oschreib> quaid: RobertM lets talk about it later on
14:16:56 <quaid> #idea the feature owner can put the wiki page in a different category  e.g. [[Category:Feature complete]]
14:16:58 <ilvovsky> here
14:17:02 <quaid> sorry :)
14:17:19 <oschreib> READ10: when should it get into Fedora?
14:17:41 <READ10> crobinso: ^
14:18:12 <oschreib> #info patch waiting for a review
14:18:37 <oschreib> ok, moving on
14:19:13 <oschreib> #info It's impossible to create bond with setupNetworks (component: vdsm, status: ASSIGNED)
14:19:23 <crobinso> oschreib: didn't realize that patch was actually upstream yet. i'll do a build today
14:19:23 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831998
14:19:35 <oschreib> crobinso: thanks.
14:19:43 <oschreib> ilvovsky: any updates?
14:20:57 <ilvovsky> oschreib: already fixed and pushed in upstream. should backport it for federico's ovirt branch
14:21:12 <oschreib> ilvovsky: time estimation?
14:21:58 <ilvovsky> oschreib: backport is tomorrow, but as I know Federico in vacation
14:22:32 <oschreib> ilvovsky: so someone else should build it
14:22:41 <oschreib> ilvovsky: release is in two weeks currently
14:23:01 <oschreib> #info merged upstream, waiting for the Fedora backport
14:23:15 <oschreib> ilvovsky: please make sure someone handles it.
14:23:25 * quaid has battery low & has to go, sorry
14:23:48 <oschreib> #info vdsmd init script times out due to lengthy semanage operation (component: vdsm, status: POST)
14:23:57 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832199
14:24:06 <oschreib> ilvovsky: updates?
14:25:59 <ilvovsky> oschreib: under review
14:26:08 <oschreib> ilvovsky: time estimation?
14:26:47 <ilvovsky> oschreib: dunno, need check with Danken. it should get to upstream first
14:26:55 <oschreib> #info patch in review
14:27:26 <oschreib> #info 3.1: sshd daemon is not starting correctly after complete the installation of oVirt Node (component: node, status: MODIFIED)
14:27:35 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832517
14:27:53 <oschreib> fabiand: updates?
14:28:04 <fabiand> oschreib, we've tracked the problemd own and it should be fixed
14:28:15 <oschreib> any new node build?
14:28:22 <danken> oschreib: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/5600/ only need a verification upstream
14:28:29 <fabiand> not yet, I suppose mburns will handle this .. in the next days
14:28:35 <oschreib> danken: what's that?
14:28:55 <danken> slow selinux thingy you've asked igro earlier
14:29:05 <danken> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832199
14:29:38 <mburns> oschreib: plan to build new image today if at all possible
14:29:47 <oschreib> mburns: cool, thanks
14:30:01 <oschreib> #info bug fixed, new node build today if possible
14:30:14 <oschreib> #action mburns to build and upload new node version
14:30:34 <oschreib> danken: please try to push this one, release is in two weeks
14:30:37 <oschreib> moving on
14:30:49 <mburns> oschreib: i have maybe 10 min, so anything else for me?
14:31:05 <oschreib> next bug is yours too :)
14:31:30 <oschreib> #info 3.1: iptables blocking communication between node and engine (component: node, status: MODIFIED)
14:31:36 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832539
14:32:00 <oschreib> mburns: fabiand: will be there in next build?
14:32:23 <mburns> oschreib: yes
14:32:28 <danken> oschreib: I could use the community's help with verification ( aglitke_ ;) )
14:32:43 <mburns> oschreib: anything that is MODIFIED will be in the next build
14:32:57 <oschreib> danken: feel free to send a mail to engine-devel/users asks for verification
14:33:07 <oschreib> #info should be in next build
14:33:13 <oschreib> mburns: ok, thanks
14:33:45 <oschreib> #info ovirt-node can't be approved due to missing /rhev/data-center (component: vdsm, status: ON_QA)
14:33:51 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832577
14:33:52 <danken> oschreib: I know. it is a non-moderated list
14:34:16 <oschreib> danken: ilvovsky updates on the bug above?
14:35:04 <danken> oschreib:  status: ON_QA)
14:35:16 <oschreib> danken: it's in the Fedora build?
14:35:19 <danken> it's in -2 build
14:35:29 <oschreib> #info waiting for a verification
14:36:05 <oschreib> #info 3.1 Allow to create VLANed network on top of existing bond (component: vdsm, status: POST)
14:36:20 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833119
14:36:41 <oschreib> ilvovsky: updates and time estimation for getting into a Fedora build?
14:37:44 <oschreib> ilvovsky: danken - looks like a RHEL bug to me, that shouldn't be part of the list
14:37:53 <oschreib> ilvovsky: danken - can you clone and fix it please?
14:38:29 <ilvovsky> oschreib: It's already pushed upstream
14:38:53 <danken> ilvovsky: could you cherry-pick it into ovirt-3.1?
14:39:01 <danken> (together with the rest of your fixes)
14:39:09 <ilvovsky> oschreib: as I told you I'll do it tomorrow
14:39:20 <ilvovsky> danken: yes, I know
14:39:45 <oschreib> ilvovsky: that's fine, but it's not an oVirt bug
14:40:11 <danken> oschreib: don't become a process junkie now
14:40:32 <oschreib> please try to fix it.
14:40:56 <oschreib> #info pushed upstream, should be backported tomorrow to Fedora
14:41:24 <oschreib> #info Failed to add host - does not accept vdsm 4.10 (component: vdsm, status: ON_QA)
14:41:33 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833201
14:41:43 <oschreib> danken: same verification issue?
14:43:42 <danken> oschreib: yes, 4.10 bootstrap is in the latest build
14:43:51 <oschreib> #info waiting for a verification
14:44:18 <oschreib> #info  [vdsm][bridgeless] BOOTPROTO/IPADDR/NETMASK options are not set on interface (component: vdsm, status: NEW)
14:44:26 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834281
14:44:34 <oschreib> danken: why it's 3.1 blocker exactly?
14:45:35 <danken> oschreib: it means the bridgeless networking is useless
14:45:54 <oschreib> danken: bridgeless network is not a part of release criteria
14:46:06 <oschreib> danken: if you really want to fix it - it's up to you
14:46:18 <oschreib> but it's not a 3.1 blocker according to http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Second_Release
14:47:11 <danken> the thing is that this is enabled in the guy
14:47:12 <danken> giu
14:47:14 <danken> gui
14:47:19 <danken> arhhhh
14:47:33 <RobertM> Question should https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834471 be considered a release blocker?
14:47:37 <danken> so people are going to bang their heads why this does not work
14:47:52 <danken> but you could close this bug with a release note if you really hate it
14:48:18 <oschreib> danken: I'm not thinking we should close it, just not to put it as a 3.1 blocker.
14:48:51 <oschreib> RobertM: sounds to me the same - not in the release criteria. if engine-core has time to fix and backport it - fine.
14:49:23 <RobertM> It completely breaks gluster support?
14:50:08 <oschreib> RobertM: I didn't say I don't agree with you. you can start a topic about it in the mailing list, I can't change the release criteria in such a stage
14:50:22 <RobertM> oschreib, Understood
14:51:06 <oschreib> #info not a 3.1 blocker
14:52:00 <oschreib> #info Leak of keystore file descriptors in ovirt-engine (component: engine, status: MODIFIED)
14:52:08 <oschreib> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834399
14:52:22 <oschreib> #info pushed and backported, waiting for a build
14:52:27 <oschreib> ok, that's it.
14:52:51 <oschreib> sounds to me like we have lots of vdsm bugs in progress, which might put the release in risk
14:53:34 <oschreib> I guess we will have to wait until next week and see the status
14:53:52 <oschreib> anything else on release?
14:55:08 <oschreib> #topic Sub-project reports
14:55:22 <oschreib> sounds to me like we covered it in the bug section
14:55:32 <oschreib> anything important to share with use?
14:57:17 <oschreib> #info status covered in BZ overview
14:57:29 <oschreib> #topic Upcoming workshops
14:57:56 <oschreib> any updates regarding this topic?
14:59:25 <oschreib> #info no updates about upcoming workshops
14:59:41 <oschreib> sgordon: willing to talk about RN?
14:59:45 <sgordon> well, briefly
14:59:49 <sgordon> in as much as there are none
14:59:56 <oschreib> #topic Release notes
15:00:05 <oschreib> sgordon: the stage is yours
15:00:12 <sgordon> so as i was saying, itamar pointed out there are no feature bugs in ovirt land
15:00:29 <sgordon> so the only options i have to generate release notes is either to get them out of the wiki, or downstream rhev bugs
15:00:35 <sgordon> both of which are pretty pitiful options
15:01:00 <sgordon> because the wiki doesn't really give any indication of what is / isn't done
15:01:24 <RobertM> Is there any why to get that info out of gerrit?
15:01:26 <sgordon> so post-summit itamar is going to try help me out with the release notes for 3.1
15:01:34 <sgordon> RobertM, sure, but then you get too much
15:01:39 <RobertM> Is is Gerrit too details
15:01:42 <sgordon> release notes listing every commit are meaningless
15:01:53 <oschreib> I guess maintainers should tell you which new features are in
15:02:01 <sgordon> well i think ideally going forward
15:02:06 <sgordon> there should be feature bugs
15:02:08 <sgordon> in the ovirt project
15:02:27 <oschreib> +1
15:02:35 <sgordon> and ideally they would be attached to the tracker for the next release when they are done
15:02:52 * RobertM was going to ask how to propose a feature :)
15:02:56 <sgordon> so for 3.1 we're just going to struggle through and do our best, but that's what i would like to see in future
15:03:17 <sgordon> well, to me the answer to that RobertM is an RFE in bugzilla
15:03:30 <sgordon> the wiki should really be the place for fleshing out the feature design
15:03:42 <sgordon> rather than actually proposing it, but again that is just my opinion
15:04:51 <oschreib> #info 3.1 release notes should be given to sgordon by mail
15:05:24 <sgordon> yeah, expect further badgering in about a week if i haven't received anything
15:05:38 <oschreib> sgordon: I'll help you with that.
15:05:45 <sgordon> subproject maintainers need to take advantage of this
15:05:55 <sgordon> this is the chance to highlight all the new stuff you've been working on
15:06:04 <oschreib> #action oschreib to nag maintainers about RN
15:06:09 <sgordon> we need to do better than me just trying to guess what you've all been up to ;)
15:06:11 <oschreib> sgordon: agreed
15:07:16 <oschreib> anything else?
15:08:17 <sgordon> nope
15:08:19 <oschreib> ok, thanks anyone
15:08:31 <oschreib> meeting ends in 3
15:08:39 <oschreib> 2
15:08:46 <oschreib> 1
15:08:51 <oschreib> #endmeeting