15:01:00 #startmeeting 15:01:00 Meeting started Wed Feb 8 15:01:00 2012 UTC. The chair is quaid. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:01:27 rbergeron: what's the command to name the meeting? 15:01:50 heh- i used to help out with meetbot :) 15:02:01 #topic Hello, hello, hello - roll call for 5 15:02:14 MTecknology: ooh, I <3 meetbot :) 15:02:20 * sgordon is here 15:02:22 * oschreib here 15:02:24 * mburns here 15:02:41 * MarkBaker Mark Baker is here 15:02:46 * mgoldboi here 15:02:47 sgordon: I guess not. (about rpm signing) 15:02:58 * MTecknology watches in 'here' 15:03:08 * pmyers in 15:03:11 oschreib, hmm ok 15:04:24 * jimjag is here 15:04:40 * ykaul here. 15:04:49 quaid: #meetingname 15:05:04 thanks 15:05:05 quaid: fyi -- http://meetbot.debian.net/Manual.html 15:05:08 xTs_w: care if I bug you in query? 15:05:12 #meetingname oVirt Weekly Sync 15:05:12 The meeting name has been set to 'ovirt_weekly_sync' 15:05:23 MTecknology: do it 15:05:41 mburns: thanks, haven't seen the full manual! 15:05:56 #topic Administrivia - the great hand-off 15:06:09 just a quick note about this 15:06:46 for those who haven't heard, rbergeron just accepted the role of Fedora Project Leader 15:07:07 congrats rbergeron ! 15:07:10 +1 15:07:13 congrats! 15:07:13 rbergeron: congratulations!!! 15:07:17 g+1 15:07:45 MTecknology: rpm :) 15:07:52 so I'm wrestling the reins of running this meeting from her from now, although she's welcome to to guest-run a meeting any time :) 15:08:18 in a few weeks I'd like to see if anyone else wants to run (or learn how to run) this meeting 15:08:30 otherwise, I figured I would just do it for now 15:08:41 I will but next week :) 15:08:46 cool 15:09:05 * mburns knows how, but doesn't really want another meeting to run... 15:09:20 but i can in a pinch if no one is around 15:09:23 mburns: yeah, this is more to encourage NEW meeting leaders :) 15:09:37 mburns: thanks though, if I ever oversleep feel free to just start things :D 15:09:44 ok, moving along ... 15:09:48 then I'm out! Who needs the extra work?! (Sorry) 15:09:50 ack 15:10:05 because I'm slow at this, I didn't do up an agenda 15:10:15 let's quickly set one and move on 15:10:20 #topic Setting agenda 15:10:27 I've got in mind: 15:10:29 First release, next release 15:10:35 yep, that's the first one 15:10:39 :) 15:10:44 * Update on Beijing workshop 15:11:02 anyone want to add something now? 15:11:09 otherwise, we'll save room at the end 15:11:20 #topic First release 15:11:26 oschreib: how is it going? 15:11:46 We discuessed yesterday about the go/no go 15:11:50 and GO it is. 15:12:12 everything is ready, rpms and tarball are ready in nightly (just sent a mail about it an hour ago) 15:12:29 this is great news 15:12:33 congrats to all 15:12:46 so if everything will go fine, we will release tomorrow, 15:00UTC (or something like that) 15:12:56 have we written up a release announcement? 15:13:01 mburns: any update from the node perspective? 15:13:30 I didn't write any announcement. 15:13:30 quaid, i would say not really, the release notes as it stands are here: http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Release_Notes 15:13:37 oschreib: built the node this morning with new iscsi-initiator-utils 15:13:38 #agreed oVirt first release 9 Feb ~1500 UTC 15:13:41 will be testing this morning 15:13:56 superb. 15:14:06 some more good news - ovirt-engine-sdk is in Fedora 17! 15:14:21 #action quaid will work-up an announcement with jbrooks 15:14:28 oschreib: excellent 15:14:44 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13250 15:14:44 #info ovirt-engine-sdk is in Fedora 17 15:14:45 oschreib: what is 'if everything will go fine' - what else is needed? 15:15:09 ykaul: If we won't fined any release blocker, and if the new rpms will pass smoketest 15:15:33 mgoldboi: yeylon: did you see the new rpms? 15:15:48 oschreib: please note that i have not touched it - and probably won't make it till tomorrow - arrived a bit late for me 15:15:51 oschreib: anyone looking for release blockers? 15:16:03 the community :) 15:16:33 mgoldboi: I'm sorry for the late arrival, we had some major issues this morning 15:17:15 quaid: so I'm leaving the formal announcement to you, right? 15:17:39 oschreib: I'll write it up, you can send it :) 15:18:03 quaid: sounds good. I can translate them to hebrew. :-P 15:18:04 we'll cook it up on a wiki page before today is done so you have it ready 15:18:10 heh 15:18:22 * quaid is good at writing for l10n 15:18:38 sgordon: I've created a repo in stable 15:18:52 yeah i saw that, i am just dropping it in the install guide now 15:19:14 we should probably edit some wiki pages about it (so people will use the stable, not the nightly) 15:19:17 #info oVirt first release is ready ... barring any last minute blockers 15:19:27 oschreib: good point 15:19:31 what pages do we need to change? 15:19:40 #link http://ovirt.org/get-ovirt 15:19:43 that's one 15:19:46 http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Installing_ovirt_from_rpm 15:20:12 get-ovirt should contain a link to the tarball as well. 15:23:27 #action quaid Add link to tarball on get-ovirt page, fix other pages so people use new stable 15:23:46 #link http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Installing_ovirt_from_rpm 15:23:57 ok, I'll look around for anything else that needs changing 15:24:13 anything else on first release? 15:24:24 #link http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Release_Notes 15:24:31 * quaid getting all the links we need in the notes :) 15:24:53 quaid: do we have an update-to-first-release policy of some sort? I assume for security issues, we'll release something. What else? 15:25:23 how do you mean by policy? as in a recommendation to people to update? 15:26:01 Please note that upgrade is not supported (installer wise, mentioned in RN) 15:26:38 yeah i have taken all the bits about upgrade out 15:26:44 do we have engine-cleanup oschreib ? 15:26:52 14[[07Features/Design/DetailedHotlugNic14]]4 !10 02http://www.ovirt.org/w/index.php?diff=2272&oldid=2152&rcid=2343 5* 03Roy 5* (+308) 10/* Engine - VDSM API */  15:27:01 sgordon: indeed, with few bugs :) 15:27:03 engine-cleanup exists, but doesn't appear to work completely... 15:27:08 ok... 15:27:11 14[[07Special:Log/upload14]]4 upload10 02 5* 03Fsimonce 5* 10uploaded "[[02File:StorageLiveMigration1.png10]]" 15:27:14 it doesn't cleanup the jboss profile 15:27:29 we don't have JBoss profile in JBoss AS7 .... 15:27:44 then something else is messed up in my install 15:27:52 but i'll take that offline for now 15:28:05 14[[07Features/Design/DetailedHotlugNic14]]4 !10 02http://www.ovirt.org/w/index.php?diff=2274&oldid=2272&rcid=2345 5* 03Roy 5* (-7) 10/* @EJB API = */  15:28:30 policy = some kind of rules by which we decide when to release an update. If a bug is a security bug, if it is warranted because of a platform change (Jboss changes, underlying Linux), if it's because of a data corruption bug we found, etc. 15:29:09 isn't that going to be problematic if we dont have ovirt-upgrade yet? 15:29:36 with engine, yes, but that doesn't apply to vdsm and node 15:29:37 or are we going to attempt to make yum work for its dinner here? 15:30:26 sgordon: yum might work, the only issue is DB upgrade 15:30:35 we can add a manuall process for it 15:30:35 oschreib, y. 15:30:46 oschreib: and possibly configuration, if needed, but I think it can be a manual thing. 15:31:51 any volunteer for the upgrade documentation? 15:33:05 is that needed for this release? 15:33:09 to clarify, are we talking about upgrade for first release 15:33:15 indeed 15:33:17 or for a potential future issue as yaniv was saying 15:33:19 heh 15:34:42 I don't think it's needed for the release, only if we will have updates... 15:34:59 I'll take care of it. 15:35:29 if you can put it in the wiki or somewhere i can try integrate it into the install guide where the upgrade stuff i had to drop is 15:35:40 but i think we need to make sure it actually works ;) 15:36:10 sgordon: I won't be able to finish this before next week 15:36:11 +1 15:36:29 ok, that's starting to sound like we're looking in to the next release now ... 15:36:38 well i think for the first release we stick with what we have been saying 15:36:43 which is no upgrades from nightlies 15:36:55 it's something we should have a solution for when it comes to the next release though 15:37:08 14[[07Features/Design/StorageLiveMigration14]]4 !10 02http://ovirt.org/w/index.php?diff=2275&oldid=2249&rcid=2346 5* 03Fsimonce 5* (-373) 10 15:37:10 good 15:37:13 (and for anything that comes up in between...which i think is what ykaul was getting at) 15:39:57 #topic Next release 15:40:10 so I forget if we had discussed the release rhythm yet 15:40:20 we need to set a date (or to start a mailing list discussion) 15:42:42 and release criteria. Or we can stick to the one we've had for v1. 15:42:46 do we have any people from engine / vdsm floating around? 15:42:48 #action oschreib to start a discussion on arch@ about release dates/timing for next release :) 15:43:00 otherwise yeah, mailing list 15:43:11 yeah, we won't solve that one here today :) 15:43:17 would be nice to set some goals for it as well as tightening the release criteria 15:44:22 +1 15:44:36 ykaul: I'm for raising the bar for next release, don't worry . 15:44:41 +1 15:47:24 ok, enough on that topic 15:47:34 * quaid waits for 10 seconds just in case 15:47:34 +100 :) 15:47:45 #topic oVirt workshop in Beijing 15:47:57 #link http://www.ovirt.org/news-and-events/workshop/ 15:48:14 we started publicizing the next workshop, which is 21 March in Beijing 15:48:50 the two days prior (19, 20 March) will be intensive sessions with some of the Red Hat team working with folks from IBM and Intel 15:48:59 then the third day is an open workshop 15:49:27 we're only 10% reserved so far, but we're on track to fill the workshop based on previous experience 15:49:38 we'll have room for about 100 people for that 15:50:26 so please spread the word 15:50:51 any questions about the workshop? logistics? etc. 15:51:20 Is it going to be a similar format to the California one? 15:51:28 ie. the sessions? 15:53:45 aglitke_: I think so, yes 15:53:57 but shorter to meet one day 15:54:07 Ok, yep. 15:54:15 so I guess the deep sessions are the first two days 15:54:33 then a day of overview that further helps integrate the IBM/Intel teams 15:54:52 Sounds good. I assume we'll be working on a more formalized agenda in the wiki? 15:54:56 yes 15:55:14 but if you've got anything you want to see etc. 15:55:22 feel free to start that agenda thread on arch@ 15:55:58 Ok. I think we should be okay with the streamlined SJC agenda. 15:56:11 Thanks, that's all I have for now. 15:57:52 ok, same for me 15:58:04 #topic Open floor - anything from you? 15:58:13 anything for our last few minutes? 15:59:21 in that case :) 15:59:25 #endmeeting